Armies of Liberation

Jane Novak's blog about Yemen

The Need for Truth

Filed under: General — by Jane Novak at 4:11 pm on Thursday, October 28, 2004

I got this essay in an email from one of the ME editors I work with who does groups mailings now and then. Its a brutally critical assesment of the Arab mentality by Youssef M. Ibrahim:

Outside View: Fear dominant in Arab psyche

Published 10/26/2004 7:29 AM

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, Oct. 26 (UPI) — Fear is deeply ingrained
in the Arab psyche, a gene implanted in the Arab mind no matter where
it lives. There is a fear to speak, write, read or even hear truth.

It is so contagious in fact that it affects Arab immigrants who carry
this home-grown fear with them to new domiciles wherever they go,
hiding behind it to avoid melting into the societies they took refuge
in. There and here fear hangs in the air, blocking oxygen to the Arab
mind, dominating thinking processes, surfacing in a self-censored
media, nervous jokes, absurd commentary that wastes hours describing
black as white.
It even affects expatriates and visitors who come and go, so much that many of the foreigners who live among us in this Arab world become a version of “Lawrence of Arabia,” striving to be more Arab than the Arabs.

No one is born this way, of course. Fear is an environmentally acquired
characteristic. At home it is the product of unilateral rule,
hereditary power in republics as well as monarchial systems, rejection
of democratic culture, dominance of the male persona
which eliminates women as equal partners and a demeaning embrace of hand-kissing instead of merit as a way to climb the social ladder.

For the immigrant Arab community, these fears have been more
complicated ever since the al-Qaida attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11 2001, by the Western adoption of systematic persecution and singling out of Arabs and Muslims as potential terrorists, deepening racism and the treatment of others as second-class citizens. The sum total of it is that Arab children are growing up thinking the eminently absurd is normal. In America today, an Arab-American community of some 3 to 4 million people has no voice because it is afraid. Having a voice means attracting attention, perhaps trouble, most Arabs will tell you, which is a total failure in understanding of how democracies function.

In Europe, where some 35 million Arabs live, most have crawled back
into cultural caves – speaking Arabic, wearing the hijab, eating
Arabic and thinking Arabic instead of opening up to the societies that
embraced them.

But fear of change is not a way of life, nor is it convenient nowadays.
The Arab and Muslim worlds are undergoing massive transformations that
demand massive adjustments. Hordes of enemies are poised at the gates,
and huge internal pressure for change lies within. Our governments, our
schools, our social systems, our economies and our very sense of
ethical conduct are all failed models whose shelf life is over.

If Arab writers and pundits cannot say this, document it, analyze it
and focus on it without fear, we cannot even begin to reform. And if we
cannot reform, what is left of Arab civilization will evaporate making
place for a new agenda set by someone else. This is happening in Iraq,
and it will happen to every society that blocks the oxygen to its
people.

Even when they digest news, Arab media filter it through the prism of fear, disguised as political correctness, politeness and information
ministry rules, so much so that facts become fairly tales.

The whole world, for example, has heard about an ongoing intense
political crisis in Lebanon and the United Nations Security Council
pressures on Syria to get out of there. But the official Arab media,
very anxious not to offend “Arab brothers,” will tell you there is no
crisis there,
that both Lebanon and Syria are blessed with “fraternal” relations, and the whole thing is manufactured by both France and the United States who are “meddling” in internal Lebanese-Syrian relations.

Never mind that the Lebanese constitution has been altered to allow for
the first time a Lebanese president to stay in office beyond his term,
joining the broad ranks of Arab presidents-for-life, or that a very
prominent Lebanese prime minister, none less than Rafik Al-Hariri, has
resigned in protest.

The French have an expression “langue de bois,” or wooden tongue, to
describe this condition. It accurately profiles Arab-speak.

How many times did you read about “honor killing,” which is meant to
describe harrowing acts of bloody mayhem by emotionally deformed males
who take a knife to cut the throat of their wives, sisters or distant
female relatives often on the whim of a rumor about misbehaving or not
marrying someone the family designated? One fails to see the origin of
the word “honor” where cowardice is more appropriate. How many times
did you read about presidents who keep winning new terms with 99
percent majorities as having undergone an “election”? Elections are not
won with 99 percent majorities. We say of countries where women are not
allowed to vote, choose their future partners in life, drive, travel,
or run for office, that they are preserving “Arab and Islamic
tradition” when they are flagrantly violating the human rights of half
their population.

Arab media has been very good in dishing out criticism of American
double standards, which are many. We talk of bias for Israel and
against Muslims, and all that is correct. But let us not loose
perspective here. America is a robust democracy with a bad president on
top, and a poor candidate challenging him. But this very same America
and its pundits have described both Bush and Kerry as liars, failures,
flip-flops, double-dealers and elitists. Bush has no magical powers. He
is here today but will be gone this year or in four years. Criticizing
him is ordinary. Nobody goes to jail for it. There will be no midnight
visitors. Can we say as much for the Arab order?

-0-

This essay first appeared in Gulf News.

9 Comments »

1

Comment by Tim

10/28/2004 @ 5:13 pm

Jane, How do Arabs living in America reconcile the differences where Arab-Americans have the right to vote in this country without fear of reprisal. Certainly free speech has been demonstrated by major Arab/Islamic political action groups vocal and public announcements to back Kerry. Can such a thing, under todays environment be said of Arabs in Syria, Egypt, Libyia and many others?

2

Comment by John

10/28/2004 @ 5:25 pm

Youssef Ibrahim is indeed a good writer. And he’s put his finger on the issue.

If I can take a whack at answering Tim’s question…

There are several sorts of Arab-Americans. Those who came here in the 18th, 19th, early-20th C. came here to escape problems and meld into the population. They were largely Christians and mostly from Syria/Lebanon. They were escaping economic problems for the most part.

Since the 1960s, Arab immigrants have continued to come from those countries, but more often they’re from other places. They are also Muslim in the majority. The Christian Arabs were very Europeanized Arabs. They spoke French, their kids went to decent schools. They put a high value on education.

The newer Arabs are escaping political as well as economic problems. In the countries they came from, free speech often equated with suicide. They have never had experience with political rights and have taken a long time to learn them. Choosing to live exclusive lives hasn’t helped, as Ibrahim points out.

They’ve also not sought to blend into the existing population even to the point of becoming Arab-American: they remained Egyptian-Americans, Yemeni-Americans, etc. As was the rule at home, if someone else profited, it was usually at your own expense. There was no possibility of cooperation.

This is not to shake a stick at Arabs. You can find the same mentality in Chinatowns across the US, where third- or even fourth-generation Chinese-Americans don’t/can’t speak English. They’re perfectly cocooned in their ghettos and needn’t have any dealings with the outside world.

I think we have to push harder for an assimilationist approach toward immigration, and not settle for “diversity” at the cost of a uniformity of cultural values.

3

Comment by Tim

10/28/2004 @ 7:32 pm

John, thanks very much. What is equally interesting is that first generation immigrants, to this country, up hold traditions from the “old” country and by the 2 to 3rd generations assimilation into our culture is usually firmly rooted. Can Islamic Arabs eventually assimilate, given that the Constitution affords them the right to freely practice Islam?

4

Comment by Kathy K

10/28/2004 @ 8:10 pm

I think they can. There is a strong fear among many of the more ‘fundamentalist’ Muslims here that their children are becoming ‘kufr’ (infidels…). Especially their female children who quite often seem to prefer freedom to forced marriage (who’d a thunk it) to some unknown cousin.

5

Comment by Kathy K

10/28/2004 @ 8:21 pm

Last comment was to Tim..

More on topic (and again regarding ‘freedom’). There’s hope for the Arab world. The Iraqis seem to have taken to freedom of speech with great enthusiasm (read some of the Iraqi blogs if you doubt). As for fear, it has become almost a tradition already that when there is a bombing of a police or national guard recruting station that the next day the lines get longer.
I think freedom may be the most subversive thing we have to offer. Let’s spread it around some more. :)

6

Comment by joe 90

10/29/2004 @ 10:47 pm

Dear Borg,
Isn’t the french expression c.’gueule de bois’, meaning a hangover, a mouth of wood, when you wake up the morning after.
As for the great US institution of criticism without being put in jail, what about the political prisoners in US Gulags such as Guatanamo, Baghram, the concentration Camp at Baghdad Airport, or, oops, Abu Ghraibh (remember where that is, or have you forgotten already.
Sorry to remind you again, but the Pentagon illegaly invaded a defenceless third world country and is responsible for the murder of 100,000 Iraqi human beings, to date (watch this space as the massacres by the evil Pentagon human slaughterhouse carry on).

The first thing the US government did to save South Vietnam for democracy was carpet bomb its population with B-52s.
You people are such evil racists. Hitler would be proud to have you all in his party.
My thoughts are with the defencelees population of Falluja, as they face an act of violent and inhuman barbarity at the hands of their ‘liberators’ Goebbals would be proud and Orwell would not be surprised.

7

Comment by Tim

10/30/2004 @ 7:28 am

joe 90,

Are you a regular on Kos’ site? Anyway, the “political” prisoners held at Gitmo and elsewhere were unfortunately detained due to the fact that, oh I don’t know, THEY WERE TRYING TO KILL OUR TROOPS AND SOME WERE IMPLICATED IN THE PLANNING OF 911. And, let’s not forget that those poor souls that would eventually be released just happen to crawl their way back to Afganistan to join, again, on the fun. Some were actually killed this time, to which I say…GOOD!

Your reference of Iraq being a defenseless third world country fails to reason with logic considering all of the munitions provided by those lovable French and Russian arms dealers. Look at the current news about Al Qaqaa, surely this drives home that Iraq was a living breathing “time bomb” waiting to implode on it’s self and explode on it’s neighbors. But, I can see that from your reasoning, 300,000 plus mass graves was Saddam’s attempt to fertilize the arid desert in an attempt to assit Iraq’s agriculture programs.

As for as B-52 actions in Vietnam, research the issue from both sides and I think that you find a surprising answer both supporting and equally debunking your claims.

And, last but not least, Falluja being defenceless? There are enough thugs and Islamiracist “teamsters” roaming the streets and “holy” shrines to defend that city….for now. Goebbal can be just as easily equated to Kerry, Edward, Joe Lockhart, well you can add in the rest.

8

Comment by joe 90

10/30/2004 @ 9:31 pm

‘You don’t know’, how many ‘combatants’ have been returned to their jobs driving taxis in Kabul, and suchlike, before they were illegaly kidnapped by the world’s biggest terrorist organisation, the US government.
How many convictions ? How many people have been tortured and murdered in the US Gulags since the latter-day Reichstag Fire, which gave your Neo-Nazis the excuse they were looking for to attack and destroy the US Constitution?
These so-called ‘Conservatives (which they aren’t, conservatives by definition don’t want to change things) recognises no international laws or treaties; despised the organisation set up after WWII to make sure that wars never occur again; refuse to let WMD and Nuclear organisations inspect suspected sites; attacks defenceless countries on a presedential whim; don’t recognise the Geneva Conventions so, therefore. can never complain about acts of terrorism; provides a moral and finincial bankrupt stae with the wherewithal to carry out its racist sadistic policies against the defenceless illeh=gally occupied Palestinain people.
I mean, the list of US govt terrorist activities is endless. Destruction of democracy recently in Haiti; the attack on social democracy in Columbia under the now quickly vanishing advertising campaign called ‘the war on drugs’. Now the evil Pentagon War Machine has a better demon to scare the soporific US domestic population out of their taxes with iconsequential nobodies and nowheres like Hallowe’en Osama, and the citizens of Falluja, who are about to launch another Pearl Harbour Attack, if something isn’t done about it.
I think you will find the US has absolutely no political support in the world, which is why it has to lead its policies with terror and violence, where it reigns supreme. The Pentagon can always win battles, but has as yet to win any wars. Oh, I wonder why?

9

Comment by Tim

10/31/2004 @ 7:22 am

Joe,

Take heart, come this Tuesday, you may get your wish with a Kerry victory. And here is the irony to it all. Nothing will substantially change. We’ll still be in Iraq, for how long, who knows. The Middle East will still be a political minefield just as it was under Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr, Clinton, and Bush Jr. Palastinians will still be getting the shaft, not because of the US or Israel, but because the self-appointed leaders need a down-trodden populace to justify and feed their lust for power. Palastine since antiquity has been the “sacraficial lamb” for self serving Arabic ideologs for the purpose to push an agenda of hate. A truely free Palastine renders those in power impotent.

Under Kerry, Haiti will still, as always, remain a dung hole, until it’s people rise up and say that they have had enough and take responsibility for their own self determination.

So, Joe, Kerry may win this election, but in the end, not one damn thing will change, because the old international institutions wish fervently for the same old tired status quo.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 3837 access attempts in the last 7 days.