Armies of Liberation

Jane Novak's blog about Yemen

Free thought shunned

Filed under: General — by Jane Novak at 8:34 am on Tuesday, November 30, 2004

What good is a private intellectual?

CSM: In a move intended to muffle the voices of some of China’s most prominent and independent scholars and activists, hard-line elements in the new Hu Jintao government are seeking to eradicate the concept of “public intellectuals” in China.

A new “gray list” has been created, sources say, of historians, economists, writers, environmentalists, and other Chinese who have offered a critical voice or been influential in recent years in Chinese society outside official circles, and who have started to be referred to as “public intellectuals.” The term until now has connoted dignity and worth….Public intellectuals are often guilty of “arrogant elitism,” the editorial continued, accusing them of trying to create a “hegemony and monopoly” of their own views and urging the Chinese people, most of whom are not familiar with the meaning of public intellectual, to “stay calm” in the face of such challenges.

1 Comment »

1

Comment by actus

12/4/2004 @ 6:15 pm

‘The term until now has connoted dignity and worth….Public intellectuals are often guilty of “arrogant elitism,” the editorial continued, accusing them of trying to create a “hegemony and monopoly”

Are they from northeastern china, where they drink lattes and drive volvos?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 20590 access attempts in the last 7 days.