Once its an article, twice he’s a troll
BOOOORING I thought after they realized they couldn’t bribe me, there might be a new strategy. But no, just another article trashing Jane in Yemen.
lets review: first there was Jane Novak a docile pupil of a monkey monk,then came my response, then an editorial apology, then an oped, then an actual article by me about Yemen (#15)
now we get: Is it true Jane Novak is from Aal-Albait?
no I’m from Brooklyn.
Its getting a little stale. But since I need something for the Cotillion on Tuesday, I’ll do a very minor fisking:
If America had a group of armed insurgents claiming godly rights to power and advantage, that any opponent to those exclusive rights and power were infidels and should be exterminated, what would the reaction of the American people be?
Well actually America does have that. Its called al-Qaeda. The reaction of the moonbats on the left seems to be to want to secure their rights and protect their library privilges. The conservatives advocate a more pro-active and rigorous approach.
And that of the Bush administration or Congress?
Well, Im reasonably certain that if there were a few al-Qaeda in Cleveland, President Bush and Congress would NOT decide to surround the city with military, exclude the journalists, indescrimately bomb the people, cut off food to the citizens, arrest doctors who provide medical treatment, exclude humanitarian organizations, arrest 12 year olds, randomly arrest ten thousand citizens without cause, hold them without trial for a year, drag burnt bodies around Cleveland behind police cars, run over the injured Americans with US tanks, rape women, spray chlorine gas, attack civilians with helicoper gunships, confiscate the computers from the New York Times and arrest Judith Miller when she tried to write about it, arrest members of Amnesty International who try to publicize it, bomb the Democrats headquarters and kidnap Hillary, and then use PBS to publicly denounce everyone in Cleveland as racists who deserve to die. This is whats happening in Yemen to the Shiites under the direction of Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh. And no, I dont think that’s what Bush and the Congress would do here in the US.
What a moron this guy is, including this:
What, I ask, is more ridiculous than the weak translation of the same reply on the pages of the backwards, racist party’s mouthpiece, “Al-Shoura.”
Obviously someone forgot to tell Olify that al-Khaiwani is famous here in the US. If there was a survey of American conservatives asking for the name of a middle eastern editor, the only one widely known is al-Khaiwani, not just from when the Coalition of the Willing had a half million daily viewers tracking his appeal, but also from the six articles I wrote about him before that. Also the fact that he publishes my pro-democracy articles in al-Shoura in Arabic in Yemen doesn’t hurt his fan base either. So again, the wrong move for the US.
Otherwise Im back to work. I have no more time for Yahya the yo-yo. Weeell, maybe first I’ll cross post this at the other six websites where I have posting privileges. heh Thanks guys. Update: Beth is having open trackbacks. Love those inline trackys.
(Update for anyone coming late to the party. Here’s a little something from the Tides foundation on the al-Haq party mentioned in the article: In 2002, when then the idea was circulated inYemen for “strikes against US interests” in retaliation for US support of Israel, the parties reacted: the al-Haq party opposed this slogan and the concept. Al-Haq and the PFU instead called for a boycott of American products. Islah, in a statement issued by Zindani, on the other hand, urged the prompt opening of training camps to train Yemenis to go fight in Palestine.)
