Armies of Liberation

Jane Novak's blog about Yemen

Jane Novak slams President Saleh’s regime on Al-Jazeera

Filed under: General, Yemen, mentions — by Jane Novak at 4:56 pm on Tuesday, November 15, 2005

That’s the title of the article. There’s a few more in the Arabic papers. Its a big topic today in Yemen. Also on the Yemeni forums and websites. Did I slam his regime? hmmm, yeah.

[15/11/2005] (NewsYemen) Nov 15, Sanaa – Prominent US journalist Jane Novak slammed yesterday the 27-year-long regime of President Saleh in a live debate program broadcast on Al-Jazeera and focused on Saleh’s visit to Washington DC.

In a lively televised debate on the pan-Arab international news channel, Novak said that authorities and powers are all in the hands of President Saleh, while “Yemen suffers from extreme centralization and corruption.”

She added that the people of Yemen are under tremendous economic strains while the people’s wealth is “being smuggled abroad in the form of weapons and oil, while there are numerous hungry citizens.”

Novak noted that the regime acts “against democracy and targets reformists” who wish to improve their country’s conditions.

She also noted that there is no progress in democracy in Yemen and that the US administration is not standing by the public in the open, but is helping reformists behind closed doors by promoting developmental and political reforms.

The live debate anchor Hafiz Al-Mirazi said that his program was criticized by a number of Yemeni officials for hosting Novak on the show because she represents a view that is “hostile to Yemen and the Arab world in general”.

Novak was attacked personally by another guest on the program, Faris Al-Sanabani, who works as a Press Secretary to President Saleh and is the owner of Yemen Observer. He was later warned not to target the character of guests, but to rather provide substantial concrete evidence that contradicts Novak’s claims.

Meanwhile, Yemeni Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr. Abubakr Al-Qirbi was more diplomatic in his tone when responding by Novak. He said, “Yemen would not be offended by constructive criticism that is based on the sense of responsibility, and I feel that Novak did not get the proper information so I invite her to visit Yemen and find out about democracy in Yemen and the challenges that it faces.”

However, Al-Qirbi confessed that democracy in Yemen is facing several difficulties. “Yemen is a poor country with very limited awareness and a weak economy. Those factors do affect its democracy.” he said in the program.

He added that Yemen does not deny that there are problems, “but they are not part of a governmental policy, but rather a result of accumulations of the past, and everyone participated in their creation.”

Al-Qirbi also said that Saleh’s visit to Washington did not tackle the pledge of Saleh not to rerun for presidential elections. He said that Saleh seems to be committed not to rerun again, but this issue is not of concern to Yemen-US relations because it is a local matter.

Dr. Mohamed Abdulmalik Al-Mutawakkil, the General Secretary Assistant of the People’s Popular Forces opposition party, said that “lack of democracy, equality, independent judiciary, and political reform is what created terrorism in Yemen.”

Al-Mutawakkil was only reachable by phone as Yemen’s sole satellite connection provider, the Ministry of Information, refused to allow its facilities to be used to air his interview because ‘it cannot use them for opposition figures’.

Al-Sanabani of Yemen Observer said that the number of protestors against Saleh’s regime who were demonstrating in front of the Whitehouse during Saleh’s visit to Washington were not more than 32 people, seven of who were speaking with a Somali accent.

He attacked Jane Novak saying that she was able to find space for her articles in Yemeni papers while she was not allowed to write in American publications.

Former US ambassador to Yemen Edmund Hull, on the other hand, noted that the Yemeni governments needs to exert more efforts to promote democracy and political reform in Yemen, as those issues are essential for the overall progress of the country.

It is pretty funny that the Yemeni government officials that were on spent their time attacking me instead of talking about Yemen.

And Mutawakkil said something about the American people supporting democracy or something like that which I missed at the time. And its true: the bloggers are very much with the Yemeni people. When I need publicity, there’s a lot of people with bigger websites that help me. Also the World Press editor didnt run ten articles on Yemen in a row because he likes me, he gets it about the regime and the people.

It seems al-Jazeera’s translator did a good job as well because this is pretty accurate. They did a good thing. You wouldn’t believe the email I’m getting.

13 Comments »

1

Trackback by Searchlight Crusade

11/15/2005 @ 9:24 pm

Links and Minifeatures 11 15 Tuesday

New computer was delivered Monday. Finally got it configured about 9PM. How nice it is to have a sharp, easily readable display! Will put the other one in the shop to use as a “learning” computer for Hilda. Will go get a router so both computers …

2

Comment by Ali

11/15/2005 @ 10:06 pm

Jane, don’t flatter yourself. The Iraqi Information Minister had all the face time he wanted on Aljazeera. The problem is, you don’t appeal to the Yemeni public; maybe to some Journalists, and some PR officials. The west barely knows Yemen to begin with, to even care what you shed the light on; whether accurate, or not.

However, I do admire your determination, which is never a bad thing. You should really visit Yemen, if Khaiwani is still alive, then you shouldn’t worry. You’ll get a different perspective on life there, which will help you write more accurately. Also, if you wanna appear more credible, try to keep your opinions professional, because when you use terms like “government thugs,” it gives the reader a feeling that your reporting is out of “hate”.

Goodluck on all your future endeavors,
Ali

3

Comment by Taha Abdulla Baharoon

11/16/2005 @ 12:25 am

I have been following the live debate program broadcast by Al Jazeera on 15/11/05 with regard to the visit of President Ali Abdulla Saleh to Washington DC but was disappointed to see Jane Novak persistently evading to answer the question repeatedly posed by the presenter of the program Hafiz Mirazi as to why she decided to become an expert on Yemen Affairs when she has never been to Yemen herself and the fact that she doesn’t speak a word of Arabic. One must therefore conclude that her decision is based on the principle of “eenie meenie miney moe catch a nigga by his toe”

One prime fact which Jane Novak is, or pretend to be, unaware of is the fact that there are handful self-styled Arab liberals, mostly born or bred in America, who are working hard to paint a good picture of America and these now face an up-hill job. This is evident in the fact that all those who are regarded as friends by the US automatically become suspects and vice versa. Under this vicious circle of mistrust and counter mistrust, between the US and the Arab World, even dictators of the region have now found safety and refuge amongst their own people since they are now regarded by their own people as ‘their own sons of a bitch’ an expression coined by Henry Kissinger when he spoke of the former dictator and president of Indonesia, General Suharto, also former US ally, saying: “He may be son of a bitch, but our own son of bitch”. There are indeed quite many “sons of a bitch” currently running the show in our countries, but these are our own nonetheless. It is better to live under them then under foreign occupation as the situation is in Iraq now. Important factor for Jane Novak to realize is that bitterness towards the US isn’t in short supply in the Middle East and is now transforming itself into hatred and is on its way to becoming immeasurable. She should therefore concentrate to make things better at home first. Perhaps, she could work for the change of the biased American policy against the Arab World.

According to Thomas Friedman, on BBC Hard Talk, Americans seem to careless about Anti- American feelings in the Arab World, and this what makes things even worse, because it puts the spin on the already existing vicious circle of bitterness at a time when the handful Arabs liberals are losing the battle and President Bush still firmly clings on his favorite expression of the “The civilized world”, when referring to anything western, forgetting the fact that it is the “civilized world” that started the two world wars including holocaust.

Taha Abdulla Baharoon
Abudhabi

4

Comment by Jane

11/16/2005 @ 5:34 am

Twafiq? Dang now this is annoying me, I have to find the name of the guy who runs the diesel. And get some data mining software. Its only $30 someone told me. I need to get this organized, I have names and crimes everywhere: in my three email mailboxess, in my notes. But its funny how all these people from various locations and affiliations keep telling me the same names.

5

Comment by Jane

11/16/2005 @ 5:58 am

And the dead terrorists who are living well in Yemen, thats another list I have to find. Really the regime should lay of the journalists, especially al-Khaiwani but all of them really.

6

Comment by yaseen

11/16/2005 @ 1:41 pm

Two of the best comments I have read in this site ,comment 2 above for dear brother Ali…. And comment 4 for dear brother Taha Abdulla Baharoon ….above .no doubt if Jane is independent journalist ,she would carefully read these comments with understanding ,and would take them into account and make changes in her work according ,in fact I see these two comments are really good and useful if Jane want to know the fact and see the affairs correctly, but unfortunately Jane is not independent ,,well as we know CIA has got specific set of strategies followed by tactical steps ending with operational activities ,Jane is just standing on the operational line ,,whatever some people try to explain or advice her ,would be just useless.

Despite the fact I know ,nothing is going to change some little agent of CIA ,but I want to say my opinion on aljazeera show.
Hafiz asked Jane three times that (if happened that some day she got up in the morning and found herself in high concern of Yemen).unfortunately or fortunately Jane did not answer in the beginning and then when the presenter repeated the question for the third time .Jane said that happened due to what happened to alkhawaini!!! I m asking is there any logic in such answer???

Well Jane can not convince the child with this answer ,I don’t have to show how false this answer is.the child easily can disprove it.

I m suggesting that Jane read the two comments above again.

Well, dear brother Ali suggested, Jane tries to become more professional on using words ,this is totally true ,however I think Jane should become professional on choosing the way of writing about Yemen(I mean she should go for radical change in her entire work(strategic change)).

Jane does not look like American journalist ,we read for many American journalists writing about Yemen, they write in so different manner ,(I know that for every writer there is a different style ,however, there are some basics and rules that every writer should commit to)

For example, when the highly respectable journalist and investigator (Seymour Hersh) wrote about Yemen, in his article (men hunt) after a very honest explanation of what happened with alharthi targeting , we can understand that Seymour Hersh was criticizing America administration for not taking into account the political situations of the government in Yemen. An other article for the highest journalist ,Seymour Hersh (the coming wars) ,after very honest presentation about the radical changes in the war on terrorism , we can come to conclusion that Hersh wants to tell America administration that such changes may go against Yemen government and (like if he is warning that Yemen becomes an other lost opportunity such as Syrian cooperation with America regarding intelligence information about alqeada)

Well, for writer like Hersh ,we as Arabs and Muslims r so willing and happy to read his articles and willing to let his words have influence over our concepts (not just that)
But ,don’t find it strange when u know that the Syrian president (Bashar) had met Seymour Hersh and asked him for advices about what he as Syrian president do ,Bashar was asking Hersh to tell him what to do. Don’t find it strange ,this is the way we (governments ,political parties, people, so on) deal with honest and respectable writers.
However ,for one like Jane I m sorry to say she can not convince rather than influence the child of 5 years(using her way that we see) ,so it is not just using professional words .it is changing her entire work, radical strategic change (if we can say).

I have mentioned Hersh as an example ,well, I know ,of course ,surely ,no doubt whatever there is no no way to compare between such highly respectable and honest journalist (Seymour) and Jane ,,of course the difference goes so far up .but I suggest that Jane tries to study in the school(approach) of Seymour ,Thomas Friedman and others, instead of choosing away that first hurts the person who is writing before hurting any one else.
Again I m suggesting Jane read the two comments carefully.
Finally ,I m repeating Hafiz ’s question on Aljazeera to Jane (why u r in concern of Yemen affairs) in other words (don’t u think it is none of your business ) (has some one appointed you to become the guardian on Yemenis) (don’t you realize you are the first one who gives herself the right to write about Yemen in such way) Jane ,,go and write about your shameful administration .Abu Garaib jail scandals .go and write about the 150,000 Iraqis who were killed by your administration instead of worrying about(alkhawani.!!!!!),write about the beginning stage of the collapse of the united state ,rather thinking that you as American is the center of the world .
but any way ,frankly u appeared very well on aljazeera,i hope u listen to the right ppl.

7

Comment by Jane

11/16/2005 @ 1:58 pm

The choices are not the dictators or occupation. Maybe if we all think together really hard, we might think of a third way.

Yassin, my readers know that Im not in the CIA. Do you really beleive that I am? Or are you just trying to make doubts for anyone from Yemen who might read your words?

Hersh? You are quite right, I am not like Seymore Hersh.

So my motivation is important but the corruption and no schools ect is not. And no one from the West ever wrote about Yemen before, so I cant. Is that what you are saying?

8

Pingback by Publius Pundit - Blogging the democratic revolution

11/16/2005 @ 10:09 pm

[...] This is the specific post regarding her appearance: Jane Novak Slams President Saleh’s Regime on Al-Jazeera. Kirk H. Sowell @ 8:09 pm | [...]

9

Pingback by QuickRob » Jane Novak Causes Stir During Debate on al-Jazeera

11/17/2005 @ 6:57 pm

[...] US journalist and blogger Jane Novak has caused quite a stir in Yemen with her unabashed criticism of Yemeni President Saleh’s failure to provide his citizens with real freedom and with only superficially paying lip service to the war on terrorism. She did this in an interview on al-Jazeera TV. In a lively televised debate on the pan-Arab international news channel, Novak said that authorities and powers are all in the hands of President Saleh, while “Yemen suffers from extreme centralization and corruption.” [...]

10

Comment by Concerned Citizen

11/18/2005 @ 7:45 am

LOL, the comments were entertaining..

Why do Americans always think “my gosh! those people have a leader who has a grip on the country! Those people need to be liberated!!YAY!”? OK, look wtf happened in Iraq! –Nevermind what anyone think of Saddam– Was he in control? YES, Did the Occupation f* the situation up? YES, Are the Iraqi people better off in 2005 than they were before the war?? HELL NO!

Now that I got that off my chest, I just wanna reiterate; read the previous posts carefully, they’re very constructive.

CIA, I don’t think so, at most your career ended with Tenet’s..

It’s funny how you mentioned “…corruption and no schools ect is not,” to make it look like you have a noble cause, when in fact your main topics are usually either “Khaiwani, Houthi, and Alqaeda.”

11

Comment by yemeni abroad

12/4/2005 @ 6:23 pm

Jane, if you could please send me your email, I’d like to email you my opinion because I’d really rather not post it here publicly… Thanks

12

Comment by Bob Jones

7/11/2006 @ 8:47 pm

What is the philosophical foundation for Islamic democracy? The Magna Carta and Protestant Reformation planted the seed that if the king and pope were subject to the law, then all men are equal under the law, hence the law derives from the people, for the people.

Some of your commentors seem to place their own racist agendas above those of common decency, and integrity, in government in the service of the people.

I would think that when corruption is pointed out in any government, the people of that government would be grateful rather than hateful.

If Alqueda reported on the corruption of the Boston transit authority during the Big Dig project, we certainly would be grateful.

13

Trackback by Searchlight Crusade

9/11/2007 @ 3:05 pm

Links and Minifeatures 11 15 Tuesday

New computer was delivered Monday. Finally got it configured about 9PM. How nice it is to have a sharp, easily readable display! Will put the other one in the shop to use as a “learning” computer for Hilda. Will go…

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>