Armies of Liberation

Jane Novak's blog about Yemen

Y21

Filed under: Janes Articles, Yemen — by Jane Novak at 10:27 am on Wednesday, December 21, 2005

(my new article at World Press in English and in Yemen at al-Shoura, in Arabic, and in al-Thoury in Arabic. )

Yemen: Failure or Democracy

Ahmed al-Rabei recently described the worst case for Yemen as, “an Afghan scenario and a civil war that will spread to the borders of G.C.C. countries.” Al-Rabei, a columnist for Alsharq Alwasat, wrote with great affection for the Yemeni people of his concern for the future of Yemen. Al-Rabei is not alone in his assessment of an uncertain future for Yemen. A variety of international organizations and many reports have highlighted increasingly dysfunctional Yemeni institutions and governance.

Transparency International has noted widespread and growing corruption, ranking Yemen near the bottom of its corruption scale. The qualification assessment for the U.S. funded Millennium Challenge Account determined that the Yemeni regime has moved backwards from previous assessments. In the 2005 round, Yemen failed all six “ruling justly” indicators. It failed three of the four indicators of “investing in people.” As a result, Yemen did not qualify for substantial U.S. developmental funding. The World Bank recently cut Yemen’s funding by 34 percent due to corruption. Christiaan Poortman, vice president at the World Bank, noted during a press conference that the regime’s performance indicators fell markedly.

Yemen ranks eighth on the Fund for Peace’s “Failed State Index.” The goal of the Fund for Peace (F.F.P.) is the prevention of war, and the Failed State Index analyzes states in terms of the potential for state failure, whether from implosion, explosion or erosion, with the hope of averting violent crises. Yemen exhibits many symptoms of a failing state. In the F.F.P. analysis, Yemen scored lower (more stable) in terms of social indicators and was ranked higher on economic and political indicators. An analysis of the methodology used by the Fund for Peace reveals how the concentration of power in Yemen increasingly distorts the state.

Uneven Development

One of the two standard economic predictors of state failure is “uneven development,” defined as “group based inequality, and/or impoverishment.” Yemen scored high on this criterion.

The 1990 unification of “republican” North Yemen, headed by President Ali Abdullah Saleh since 1978, with the formerly Marxist South Yemen brought Yeminis together under one flag. The basis of unification was power sharing between the two former states through a democratic multiparty system held in check by a free press. A brief civil war in 1994 was won by the military domination of Saleh’s northern forces. Saleh retained and consolidated his control of the nation during the next 10 years.

Today, discriminatory state policies threaten the stability of Yemen. Large numbers of Southerners have been forced into early retirement. Biased hiring practices in the civil services and military have resulted in widespread unemployment in the former South Yemen. A large amount of land and property has been confiscated from rightful owners. With an unequal application of the law, little legal redress is available to the victims. The preponderance of military bases and checkpoints throughout the south and monitoring by security forces give some Southerners a sense of being “a crushed minority.”

Although many natural resources are located in the South, a reduced allocation of public funds leaves the region awash in poverty. Recent years have seen an increase in the number of homeless citizens and citizens whose only resort is begging for sustenance.

Those who define the grievances of the Southern minority in the public sphere are labeled by the regime as separatists and traitors, and said to be guilty of treason. The Al Thoury newspaper, mouthpiece of the Socialist Party representing many Southerners, has been a recurring victim of the regime’s deployment of the legal system as a tool of repression.

It is worth noting that USAid has reported that half of Yemen’s children nationally are physically stunted from chronic malnutrition. There are at least 35,000 street children in Yemen and 326,000 children in the work force, a phenomenon attributed to extreme poverty, as is the increase of child trafficking.

Criminalization of the State

One political indicator in the Fund for Peace’s assessment of the potential failure of the Yemeni government is the “criminalization and delegitimization of the state,” defined as massive state corruption and crime syndicates associated with the elite. Often accompanying this phenomenon, according to the F.F.P., is resistance to accountability, transparency and representation.

The elite run criminal enterprises in Yemen include wide scale weapons trafficking, diesel smuggling, drug smuggling and human trafficking.

The Central Organization for Controlling and Audit (C.O.C.A.) in 2004 documented 68 cases of corruption totaling billions of Yemeni rials in the theft of public funds. The C.O.C.A. report documented corruption by government authorities, the oil and mineral ministry, the electricity ministry and the ministry for local administration. There were no prosecutions. For the first half of 2005, C.O.C.A. has listed 55 cases, resulting in financial losses exceeding $3 billion Yemeni rials, ($15 million U.S.). Corruption in governmental agencies has previously been reported as exceeding $9 million U.S. annually.

In an encouraging turn of events, the governor of Mahweet, despite strong pressures contrary, decided that eight education officials should be charged for the alleged embezzlement of $9 million Yemeni rials. This is one of the first corruption prosecutions of high government officials in recent history.

Public funds do not receive a transparent accounting. While oil revenues account for 75 percent of national income, the proceeds from oil sales are not accounted for publicly. One parliamentarian observed that the 2006 budget estimates oil revenues with a sale price of $40 U.S., while “the average cost of one barrel is USD 57.” The central authority requested and received a budget increase of 43 percent in December 2005 for the fiscal year. A parliamentarian said the reason the increase was necessary was “luxurious cars, high per-diem travel allowances, financial awards and aid packages to government officials on the expense of the public.”

Deterioration of Public Services

A second political indicator of possible state collapse is “progressive deterioration of public services,” in essential areas like security, health, sanitation, transportation and education services. In a typical failing state, the F.F.P. notes, state mechanisms “narrow” to function only in areas that serve the ruling elites (security forces, presidential staff, central bank, diplomatic service, customs and collection agencies.)

An analysis of Yemen’s 2006 budget shows the regimes priority is neither development nor services, but military spending, an area dominated by Saleh’s relatives. In the budget for 2006, the electric sector is allocated $27 billion Yemeni rials, which constitutes a decrease of almost 60 percent from last year’s budget, although electricity is not yet available in most rural areas and the urban population faces rolling black outs.

The increase in funds for education in the 2006 budget barely covers new enrollment. The 2006 budget makes no allocation for the one million children not in school or for the upgrading of schools. (Some schools in reality are tents or shacks.) First grade enrollment was 56 percent in 2003. Yemen has the highest rate of illiteracy in the Middle East at 51 percent, which includes 74 percent of women.

Defense and security spending, already comprising a large portion of public funding, is increased in the 2006 budget more than 50 percent from last year. Military expenditures for 2005 were four times the amount spent on health care. Yemen is at the bottom of all Arab countries in health spending and has only two medical doctors for every 10,000 Yemeni citizens. In rural areas, infant mortality is over 8 percent.

In addition to the deficiency in the basic services of medical care and education, the Yemeni public suffers health consequences from the lack of clean water and sanitation systems. A parliamentary report noted that 55,000 children die each year from water related diseases. An Environmental Protection Agency report indicated sewage service is available to half of urban dwellers and 17 percent of rural dwellers. In rural areas, where the majority of the population resides, 75 percent or more do not have ready access to clean water.

Terrorizing the Opposition

A third standard political symptom of a failing state is when state supported security forces “terrorize political opponents, suspected ‘enemies,’ or civilians seen to be sympathetic to the opposition.” The Fund for Peace ranks Yemen high on this criterion as well.

Gulf States Newsletter noted in its December issue that the Political Security Organization, which reports directly to President Saleh, “has long carried out direct actions, including the harassment of journalists and political opponents.” The year 2005 has seen a marked increase in the number of attacks on non-governmental journalists, drawing strong protests from numerous journalist and human rights organizations and some governments. Yemeni journalists have been kidnapped, stabbed, beaten, threatened and hauled into court in unprecedented numbers. Journalists report that their cell phones have been stolen and the numbers run in an apparent attempt to discover their sources.

The population of Yemen’s prison system includes children, hostages, critics of the regime and their relatives. Some citizens are imprisoned without charges, or held in prison for longer than their sentence requires. Women prisoners face degrading treatment. One of the regime’s retribution tactics is kidnapping younger siblings of opponents including human rights workers, journalists and minority advocates. Recent kidnapping victims range in age from 12 to 14. Several reports indicate that Yemen’s political security prisons use torture techniques that affect the nervous system of prisoners, causing paralysis or palsy.

The judiciary, headed by President Saleh, also acts as a tool of terror. Fuad al-Shahari wrote in a letter to Amnesty International, “I never expected that I will be tortured, witnesses will be threatened and the documents will be forged.” His execution, ordered by a commercial court, was carried out in November. The trial and death sentence of Yahya al-Dailami is viewed by much of Yemeni civil society as politically motivated. Amnesty International has labeled al-Dailami a prisoner of conscience and recently appealed to President Saleh to release him unconditionally.

Gulf States Newsletter has noted the regime’s use of “some irregular units of former jihadists” which indicates “a return to Yemen’s predilection for the use of Salafyist proxies.” Previously used by Saleh in the 1994 civil war against Southern Socialists, who were fatwa-ed and described as apostates, these irregular forces have been deployed recently against a band of Zaidi (Shiite) “rebels” and against the wider Zaidi civilian population in the northern Saada region of Yemen. The al-Shoura newspaper, a prominent defender of civilians in Saada, has been prohibited from publishing and a clone newspaper issues in its place.

A Factionalized Elite

A fourth political predictor of a failed state is what the F.F.P. calls “the emergence of a factionalized elite,” or the “fragmentation of ruling elites and state institutions along group lines.”

The structure of the elite in Yemen has President Saleh at its head. Power and privilege descends through his immediate family. The leadership of the military and security forces is in the hands of the close relatives of President Saleh including his son, his nephew, and other relatives and extreme loyalists. Elite designation also spreads from Saleh through members of his tribe. (It is equally worthwhile to highlight that Yemeni tribes are an important sector of the community, have an inherent democratic component and are modernizing valuable tribal institutions, as noted in the Yemen Times.)

In addition to privilege flowing down from Saleh through members of his family, his tribe, and the military, Saleh is also head of the ruling party, the General People Conference, where patronage is traded for loyalty. Unsurprisingly, the G.P.C. nominated Saleh as its presidential candidate, despite his public pledge to the nation not to run for re-election in order to admit “young blood” into the political system.

Saleh loyalists dominate the business arena in both criminal and legal enterprises and the political arena including the ruling party, the ministries, the parliament, the diplomatic corps and the official media. Some civil society organizations are actually an extension of the state, although others are not. The leadership of some opposition parties has been co-opted by the regime either willingly through bribery or unwillingly though threats, while other opposition leaders remain steadfast at any cost in their determination to fulfill their representative obligations.

On a positive note, authentic judicial reforms have been made by Justice Minister al-Jaifri despite opposition from powerful individuals and systematic under funding. Some members of parliament, including members of the ruling party, have begun demanding transparency and accountability from the government, criticizing the 2006 budget before its approval by Saleh loyalists who dominate the body.

According to the Fund for Peace, the emergence of a factionalized elite is often accompanied by “the rise of nationalistic political rhetoric.” This explains the Yemeni regime’s predilection for name-calling, insults, fear mongering and alarmist statements, which abounds in the state-owned newspapers, the nation’s one government-run TV station, and President Saleh’s speeches. It is typical behavior displayed by failing states.

Conclusion

As al-Rabei wrote of Yemen, “the reality remains that the worst possible outcome will be disastrous for everyone.” To pull Yemen back from the brink of disaster, “worry is not enough.” The situation is so grave that he believes immediate direct action is warranted. “Persian Gulf countries should adopt a plan similar to the Marshall Plan with regards to Yemen,” al-Rabei suggests.

As the root cause of the crisis in Yemen is the extreme concentration of executive power, any economic solution must be preceded by the decentralization of political power. “Sanaa needs to realize that no one can be more Yemeni than the Yemenis themselves,” al-Rabei notes. And Yeminis have taken the lead in devising a political and economic reform program.

The Joint Opposition Meeting Parties — the Yemeni Islah Party, the Yemeni Socialist Party, the Nasserite Popular Unionist Organization, the Arab Socialist Nationalist Baath Party, the Popular Forces Union, and the Haq Party — have drafted a workable reform platform, the centerpiece of which calls for the nation’s conversion to a parliamentary system and the empowerment of local governing bodies. Seating power in multiple elected and accountable representatives is a textbook solution and may be the most expedient remedy to address the advanced decay of the Yemeni state. The reform plan goes on to tackle economic and developmental issues. The cause for optimism is the consensus of the ideologically diverse opposition parties to work together for the betterment of the nation.

Predictably, the government labeled the reform plan treasonous. The official government daily, al-Thoura, said those who devised the strategy were guilty of a conspiracy as severe as the separatist conspiracy of the 1994 civil war and that they were terrorizing the population with falsehoods.

For 15 years, Yeminis have had a national consensus favoring democracy, a multiparty system, equal rights and unity. President Saleh has deployed these terms as the foundation of the legitimacy of his regime. As the country trends toward instability, the popular expectation of growing self-governance and a range of protected civil liberties has come face to face with a bewildering descent into authoritarianism, chaos and poverty.

A sense of normalcy has been overcome by a continuing scramble whereby the disenfranchised Yemeni society tries to fill in for the non-existent Yemeni government. Throughout Yemen, teachers are working without pay, women give birth relying on female neighbors, individuals are responsible for their own security and water, and starving people are fed by the extremely poor. The strong and community-oriented nature of the Yemeni national character is the greatest bulwark opposing anarchy in Yemen.

Yemen may be on the verge of state failure or it may be on the verge of an authentic, self-constructed democracy. One critical factor is whether a broad public consensus and peaceful political mobilization can be achieved in the context of elite domination of the mass media.

Another critical factor is elite reaction should a widespread consensus for change emerge. Over 50 people, including children, died at the hands of security forces during the nationwide, leaderless July protests. The regime blamed “saboteurs in military uniforms” for the violence. Currently the regime is escalating the level of violence against journalists, who deploy only intellect and a pen. Amnesty International has noted the regime’s targeting of civilians in the Saada region. The jails are full of prisoners of conscience and identity. As al-Rabei stated, sisterly and friendly nations have a peaceful and important role to play in supporting the development of Yemen.

Another scenario centers on a peaceful transition of power from the entrenched elite in the 2006 presidential elections. In this scenario, an opposition or nonelite candidate faces extreme disadvantages including the biased election law and electoral budget. But the momentum of a rapidly failing state coupled with rising public dissatisfaction means that a change is coming to Yemen, in one form or another.

Works Cited:
Failed State Ranking: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3100
Failed State Indicators: http://fundforpeace.web.cedant.com/programs/fsi/fsindicators.php
Raibi: http://www.asharqalawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=3022
http://www.gulfstatesnews.com GULF STATES NEWSLETTER • VOL 29 • NO 771 • 9 DECEMBER 2005 (page 8 )
2006 budget: http://yementimes.com/newsarticle.shtml?a=20_2005_12_12_3
literacy: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=898&p=report&a=1
infant mortality: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=902&p=local&a=3
3 million kids in poverty: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=901&p=local&a=11
YO corruption and COCA: http://www.yobserver.com/cgi-bin/yobserver/exec/view.cgi/1/8066
Financial rewards elite: http://yementimes.com/newsarticle.shtml?a=20_2005_12_04_7
Corruption prosecution: http://www.yobserver.com/news_8855.php
Corruption: http://www.yobserver.com/news_8844.php
Al-Dailimi: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=900&p=front&a=3
Jarallh Omar murder politically motivated says lawyer: http://www.newsyemen.net/show_details.asp?sub_no=20_2005_10_28_6731
Military vs healthcare spending: http://yementimes.com/newsarticle.shtml
Water: http://www.yobserver.com/cgi-bin/yobserver/exec/view.cgi/1/7795
Jubrari: http://www.yobserver.com/cgi-bin/yobserver/exec/view.cgi/1/8656
Prisons: http://yementimes.com/print_article.shtml?i=893&p=front&a=1
Paralysis from torture: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=892&p=front&a=4
USAID: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/07/international/07letter.html
First grade enrollment: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=861&p=culture&a=3
Reform platform: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=898&p=front&a=1
World bank: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=903&p=front&a=1
Al-Rabei, marshal plan: http://www.asharqalawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=3058
Death water related: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=903&p=health&a=1
Child labor: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=903&p=local&a=9
President Saleh: http://www.newsyemen.net/en/view_news.asp?sub_no=3_2005_12_14_5700
YT tribes: http://yementimes.com/newsarticle.shtml?a=20_2005_12_15_2
Amnesty Appeal al Dailami: http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=903&p=local&a=1
At Thoura: http://www.althawra.net./showdetails.php?id=34434
Millenium Challenge Ranking: http://www.mcc.gov/countries/rankings/FY06/index.shtml

20 Comments »

1

Comment by Mohammad Ezz

12/21/2005 @ 6:51 pm

Well, the article is Very good. But Jane ignoring any possitive things. Her article published in Arabic her in Yemen. So, it is an indicator for limited democracy of course not non exist democracy.
I have many thing to discuss with Jane. i’ll read it completely and then we’ll have a lot of notes.

2

Comment by Jane

12/21/2005 @ 10:03 pm

Ok Im waiting to hear what I am missing.

A free press is a component of democracy. A semi-oppressed press/partially free media is not an indicator of democracy, the way elections also do not mean an authentic democracy is present. But tell me what I am not seeing.

3

Comment by Movad

12/22/2005 @ 8:54 pm

Jane,

As an activities, armed with only second-hand information about Yemen, you seem to think that you know what is best for us, think that Yemenis are too * to stand up for them self, so you decided to shove a ready made recipe for success down our throats with no consideration of our country’s pace of social and democratic growth

Sure, Yemen’s progress has been slow and fluctuating. But if you look at the progress with a long term view (on a scale of a nations history) the recent change is revolutionary.

40 years ago Yemen was 98% illiterate, and It is now less than 50%. 15 years ago we had 0 people who votes, now 8000,000 have voting cards. The words (democracy, parliament, local consuls, elections).are now household terminology.

You cannot expect a country to emerge from the middle ages as Yemen did in 1962, and immediately jump right into the 21 century.

Democracy, and economic freedom are home grown, slow process everywhere in the world, Yemen is not an exception.

Let me remind you of how long it took the United States to progress in one issue only, the right to vote.

1789- Establishment of the American democracy. White men with property can vote. Poor people cannot vote. Women, Native Americans, and enslaved African-Americans cannot vote

1820 Whites can vote even if they do not own property. But they must pass religious tests to vote

1840 Religion tests are taken off the books. Only white men can vote

1866 The Civil Rights Act of 1866 grants citizenship to native-born Americans but excludes Native Americans

1870 The 15th Amendment establishes the right of African-American men to vote. In the South especially, poll taxes, reading requirements, physical violence, property destruction, hiding the polls, and economic pressures keep most African-Americans from voting.

1882 The Chinese Exclusion Act bars people of Chinese ancestry from becoming citizens. They cannot vote.

1920 Women gain the right to vote.

Finally 186 years after the Establishment of the American democracy , in 1975 The Voting Rights Act is amended and has some real impact and enforcement in the Southwest.

Full time line here. http://www.afsc.org/pwork/0410/041005.htm

Finally, Rome was not built in a day, and neither will Yemen.

4

Comment by Jane

12/22/2005 @ 10:07 pm

Movad, you are right it took a long time for the US. and you are right that there has been since 1962 progress in Yemen. But its off track due to the concentration of power, and the people are suffereing badly due to corruption. This article gives nothing of what I think about a solution. I know what i think and believe me its not in there. It gives al-Rabei’s solution (a Marsall plan). It explains why the FPP determines Yemen may become a failed state. Its says the JMP reform platform is sound academically and in theory. It says the GPC doesnt want a change, and lastly it says theres an election coming. It doesnt promote American ideas or my ideas at all, in a small way, it highlights authentic Yemeni ideas for reform, but mostly it highlights hard statistics.

5

Comment by Stefania

12/23/2005 @ 7:43 am

Front Page Mag

6

Comment by Jane

12/23/2005 @ 8:04 am

Kewl…That was quick. I like the tag line.

7

Comment by Fido

12/23/2005 @ 10:30 am

Feliz navidad, brudda.

8

Comment by Asher Abrams

12/23/2005 @ 12:10 pm

Jane, great work as always.

9

Comment by Jon

12/23/2005 @ 12:18 pm

Great research and reporting. To you and your family a very Merry Christmas. Keep up the outstanding work for it is making a difference.

10

Comment by Anonymous

12/24/2005 @ 7:38 am

wishing you and your family a merry christmasand a happy new year

11

Comment by Jane

12/24/2005 @ 8:07 am

Thanks very much. Peace on Earth, Good Will towards Men.

12

Comment by ALHAREETH

12/25/2005 @ 1:05 pm

MARRY CHRISMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR FOR ALL THE FRIENDS HERE

DECTATOR REGIMS COULD IMPORT EVERY THING FROM NEWLY ENVENTED MACHINS TO NEW IDEAS AND IMPLEMENT THEM SOON AS LONG THEY ARE FOR THEIR BENEFITS BUT WHEN IT COMES TO DEMOCRATIC REFORM OR HUMAN RIGHT OR FIGHTING CORRUPTION THEN THEY WILL TALK ABOUT DEFFERENCES IN CULTURES AND HOW IT TOOK THE US AND THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES A LONG TIME TO REACH THE LEVEL OF DEMOCRACY THEY HAVE NOW

WELL EVERY THING AND EVERY IDEA TOOK A LONG TIME TO DEVELOPE TO WHAT WE HAVE NOW,BUT NO ONE OBJECTED TO IMPORTING THEM OR USING THEM

ALL THE NATIONS AROUND THE WORLD START FROM THE POINT OTHER PEOPLE ENDED

NO ONE CAN CLAIM THAT THERE ARE NATIONS OR PEOPLE WHOM DEMOCRACY OR HUMAN RIGHT OR CLEAN FROM CORRUPTION GOVERNMENT IS BAD FOR THEM

13

Comment by yaseen

12/26/2005 @ 10:33 am

Excellent post of Movad, Jane I think his way in thinking is better. when happens we talk about some thing we should take into consideration the history, the different circumstances, the ongoing plans, near history such as 1994 war and difficulties that followed. the relation with neighboring countries ,the geopolitical influence of some breakouts in the region, and in fact the existence of Israel (from strategic view) remember the oil existence in neighboring countries and unfortunately the political difference with them which have had Yemen kinda isolated, …ext,

The Yemenis know best the situations in their country and they know best how deal with them.

By the way ,I just found it sort of funny as you tried to have Ahmed Alrabei statement your way, u made it such as if he was warning that every thing in Yemen is going to collapse ,and then you mentioned the other warnings of other organizations ,

Well, I read our brother (Ahmed alrabei) articles about Yemen, it was not the way you tried to show, he just wanted to give justifications for his idea about supporting Yemen. Particularly he was referring to the geopolitical importance of Yemen in the (Arab island (that is Yemen and the 6 gulf countries)). He mentioned such scenarios to convince those who are hesitant in accepting Yemen in GCC. He was reminding the gulf people that Yemen and gulf countries are historically under one entity (the Arab island), any one reads Ahmed article would feel (Afghan and civil war is really unexpected but justification of the idea) ,However u made it such as every one in the world worries about what is on in Yemen.

How far up does the responsibility go?

All Im doing is highlighting the situation for the West where there’s no ready understanding

For whom you are highlighting in the west? For the regular people? I doubt, for the administrations ? I doubt because they have already their own Mukhabarat
Well, I think what are you doing is no more than political blackmail. I still believe you are doing that as member of CIA (America Mukhabarat). The result of your articles are just to make the large companies in the west find the geopolitical risk of investing in Yemen is much higher than the return ,according to your articles even the most optimistic investor would find he can not take on such geopolitical risks.

Is this what are you trying to do for Yemen and Yemenis?

Is your goal to bring the regime down?
Well believe me, no single man from the Arab world accept any American intervention. Although you are in Iraq with forces and 400 billion dollar or more till now, and all these victims but still the situations there are just f***ed up (-ed),and what is worse is that your domestic policies have influence on foreign policies ,now your religious president found ,due to domestic pressure ,he has to pull out some troops, but since the situations in Iraq don’t allow ,so your administration plan to replace the boots on the ground with airpower. Experts in America have announced how trouble and risky adopting such plan, this is not the topic,, I just mean that since it seems impossible for Americans to find balance between domestic and foreign policies and due to other issues,, none in the Arab world want American intervention in managing their future, now in the Arab world the saying is (the devil you know is better than the angel America brings) rather than the old saying.

Therefore, most probably what are you doing is just political blackmail against our leaders, of course that does not help.

14

Comment by Jane

12/26/2005 @ 3:16 pm

Ok Yaseen, new rule, actually its an old rule: no cursing. If you curse, Im going to edit you like I did above or delete the comment entirely. I gave you some slack until now, but I would appreciate your cooperation on this issue like all the other commenters.

Second, I am not CIA. Its illegal in the US for the govt to use journalsits for intelligence. Not that I expect that will make an impact on you. One day, somehow or another, you’ll know I am a private citizen, a freelance journalist, and thats it.

If publishing hard statistics threatens the regime, (and apparently it does based on their public reaction), it indicates a problem not with the publishing but with the regime.

15

Comment by Jane

12/26/2005 @ 3:39 pm

Further Yassin, the article says there is group discrimination by the regime, widespread criminal activities by the elite, a near complete deterioriation of public services, habitual targeting of the opposition, and a factionalized elite. And this is why the FPP gave Yemen a high rank on the failed state index.

And you are saying its better for Americans to ignore that, to not even understand that. Understanding doesnt equal intervention.

16

Comment by Jon

12/26/2005 @ 5:37 pm

Gosh Yaseen, just when I think you are capable of a serious political discussion, you go off the handle. And to assume just cause a person compiles research and publishes it works for the CIA is laughable at best.

Being critical of the ruling party is not to be considered political blackmail, it is bringing out information to the public so the public can decide what is best for them. And to hold their govt accountable.Intervention is not even thought of. In a democracy, the govt is and should be accountable to it’s citizens. Not the other way around. In your words, why would the regime feel threatened by published reports of it’s governance and the consequences of such actions. Old saying ” Fool me once, its on you, fool me twice …. ” published information is meant to be used to inform the people so they are not fooled twice.

17

Pingback by Louisiana Libertarian » Blog Archive » RINO Sightings: New Year’s Edition

1/1/2006 @ 10:33 pm

[...] Jane at Armies of Liberation has a report on Yemen. [...]

18

Trackback by A North American Patriot

1/3/2006 @ 7:46 am

Come for a Tango or two…

Welcome to the New Year’s Ball! …The Debs have come out in full glamorous goodness, with a heart-felt Cotillion of reflection, as a fitting adieu to the passing year. The last 12 months have wrought many changes…A nation of

19

Trackback by Cotillion

1/3/2006 @ 8:00 am

Come for a Tango or two…

Welcome to the New Year’s Ball! …The Debs have come out in full glamorous goodness, with a heart-felt Cotillion of reflection, as a fitting adieu to the passing year. I am your host, Wonder Woman, and I will be…

20

Comment by Strategic tactical planning

1/27/2006 @ 11:29 am

Hello Jane, I was searching the web and found your article “Y21″. I really like your blog and found it worth while reading through the posts. I am looking to publish a comprehensive site reviewing many different articles and blogg. Please feel free to take a look at my blog at Strategic tactical planning and add anything your want.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>