And a Fisking
The article (which is inside the boxes) is from the Yemen Times and outside the lines that’s me, as per usual.
SA’ADA, Feb. 25 — Bloody clashes which broke out a month ago between the Yemeni army and Al-Houthi-led rebels in Sa’ada governorate, located 245 km. north of Sana’a, have grown fiercer. The fighting killed dozens on both sides, provoking controversy and an exchange of accusations between the opposition and the ruling party.
“Government forces used all kinds of land and air weapons in the fierce clashes that erupted last Monday and continued until Friday,” Sa’ada sources reported, adding, “Hundreds on both sides were killed or injured in the fighting. Up to 71 soldiers were killed and 202 others injured, but Al-Houthi casualties haven’t been reported because relatives can’t transfer victims to the city hospital while the government is imposing a media blackout.”
Blocking medical treatment again, like in 2005 when doctors were arrested for treating wounded Houthis and civilians in general were left without medical care for injuries sustained in the war, usually by bombs dropped by the Yemeni government.
According to the same sources, the Yemeni army has launched military operations against Al-Houthi supporters on the outskirts of Sa’ada and confrontations have shifted to the nearby mountains in Al-Talh, Al-Awairah, Al-Salem and Sahar.
Spreading, we knew it would spread. The more brutal the response, the further its going to go.
Media sources reported that dozens of Al-Houthi loyalists donned military uniforms similar to those of military soldiers, assaulted a military site near the city of Sahar and clashed with government troops for hours, killing or injuring dozens on both sides. Government air forces carried out offensives in some villages and areas, thus paving the way for advancing troops toward Al-Houthi positions.
Two days ago, security authorities stopped a car loaded with military uniforms, similar to those of the Yemeni army, headed for Al-Houthi followers and confiscated them. However, authorities didn’t mention who had sent the uniforms.
The tactics of the Iraqi insurgents and other terrorists before them have eroded the norms of war generally. When the same tactics of disguise by uniform or civilian clothing are applied against US troops, there’s little condemnation.
Local sources revealed that Al-Talh locals are enraged over the killing of prominent tribesman Jarallah Fardan and one of his daughters last Tuesday in a mortar attack by government troops positioned on the road connecting Sa’ada city to the market. Al-Talh tribal leaders met late last week to discuss the repeated army strikes which damaged 26 homes in one of Sa’ada’s most important markets.
Several sheikhs warned that locals may begin supporting the rebels and engaging in the war against government troops if artillery strikes and mortar attacks continue on the villages and homes of those who don’t back Al-Houthi. They demanded authorities determine Al-Houthi positions exactly in order to limit the fight with the loyalists to specific areas in the restive governorate.
2005 all over again. Bombing villages, their own citizens. Maybe its not intentional just very poor warfare, but the judgement call was made to take the risk- ie, killing Houthis is a higher priority than keeping Yemenis alive. And this is not an enemy population, just regular Yemenis.
Member of Parliament Yahya Badraddin Al-Houthi, who currently resides in Germany, distributed a Feb. 24 statement, a copy of which the Yemen Times obtained, alleging, “Such confrontations are an aggressive war!” and further accusing Yemeni authorities of foiling all peaceful mediation efforts.
“The Yemeni army is striking villages in such a way that violates basic human rights and the authorities cut off all telecommunications in the governorate so that nobody can see what’s happening,” the statement added.
Yahya = not a terrorist. All he does is write to the media and try to end the violence through mediation.
In a recent statement, Abdulmalik Al-Houthi, leader of the rebellion, welcomed the Joint Meeting Parties’ initiative to tackle the issue peacefully. He denied any relations with Iran or Libya, as authorities allege, confirming that he’s ready for any peaceful solution to the crisis to ensure his tribesmen their constitutional rights to express themselves.
Al-Houthi’s statement continued, “Government efforts in this regard are unacceptable behavior because it paves the way for foreign interference at the expense of Yemenis and their blood, as well as the nation’s security and stability.”
Good point. Its not an internationalized conflict now, but it could become one.
The statement, which was distributed to the media, warned of the official media’s addresses regarding sectarianism. “We reject the authorities’ attempts to spark sectarian sedition between Zaidis and Shafis. We affirm that we are brothers who love each other without any difference between Zaidis and Shafis,” the statement clarified.
On behalf of Al-Houthis, the statement criticized official media for using language regarding blasphemy against Zaidis and other Islamic sects.
Yes the offical media and government officals have tried to turn this into a sectarian conflict when the only side making that claim is the government. Zaidis and Shaifis have no problem with each other and frankly are a regional model of pluralistic religious co-existance.
Regarding his attitude toward President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s call for Al-Houthis to form a political party, abandon their mountain positions and surrender their heavy arms, the rebel leader responded, “We welcome any peaceful solution that ensures us citizenship rights and freedom of expression in conformity with the Yemeni Constitution. We accept the president’s call for us to form a political party according to the Political Parties and Organizations Law.”
Stop the presses. They accept the regimes offer to stop fighting and form a party assuming they have equal citizenship rights. Also note he didn’t reject the idea of the democratic process, so maybe he’s not a monarchist after all. Ok we know all along he’s not a monarchist but has a domestic agenda that does not include re-instating the Imaminate but does include chanting Death to America.
I dont think in the US people are allowed to congregate and chant slogans advocating genocide. And this stupid thing with the slogan seems to have been instrumental in re-igniting the conflict at various points. Is this what the deaths, the destruction, the billions in losses is all about, they want to chant the slogan? Otherwise I dont know what they want, and havent seen any good other explanation of the Houthi agenda either.
Abdulmalik said he accepts the regime offer. So everybody should find a way to stop the whole thing now, a temporary cease fire even, to see if they mean it. Everyday people are killed, soldiers, houthis and civilians. The priority has to be immediately ending the cycle of violence.
The JMP renewed its rejection of any foreign interference in the Sa’ada rebellion, but it urged rebels to surrender their arms and continue the struggle in a peaceful manner. Deputy JMP spokesman Mohammed Al-Sabri told the Emirati Al-Bayaan newspaper, “The opposition emphasizes the necessity of suggesting solutions to all national issues.”
He pointed out that the JMP opposed the Yemeni government’s manner of dealing with the issue from the very beginning, but declared that they are ready to participate in any peaceful efforts to end the crisis.
The opposition parties affirmed that peaceful democratic options are the only means to express political and social demands, thoughts and opinions. They called upon all to continue the peaceful struggle in order to embody such an option in the nation’s political life because it’s the only correct way toward a new Yemen.
The JMP got trashed for this statement by that GPC media dog. Also the regime is missing the opportunity to get the advice of the JMP in ending the fighting (which is one of the largest threats to Yemeni stability, foreign investment and economic development.) Instead the regime is villifying the JMP, but that’s nothing new.
Yemeni authorities are hunting and arresting anyone suspected of links with Al-Houthi in several governorates, including Dhamar, where local sources reported that as many as 10 individuals were arrested last week. In the capital, authorities arrested five students enrolled at Badr Religious Center, which is run by Zaidi imam Al-Murtadha Zaid Al-Muhatwari.
Additionally, the arrest campaigns targeted those who studied at the Great Mosque in Sana’a, others who belong to Al-Haq and the Popular Forces Union Party, as well as several individuals suffering mental disorders, such as Amiraddin Badraddin Al-Houthi, who is psychologically ill.
Arbitrary arrests again, like 2005, politicized arrests and targeting the parties, the mentally ill and anyone else.
Local Sa’ada authorities have announced that dialogue with Al-Houthi loyalists has reached an impasse. “Dialogue and negotiations with the terrorist elements have reached a deadlock. Al-Houthi supporters don’t understand anything except force,” September.net quoted a Sa’ada source as saying last Thursday, more than a week after mediation efforts were halted.
Other sources report that residents of Khawlan area in Sa’ada are experiencing harsh living conditions because they can’t obtain foodstuffs. The same sources added that locals refuse to engage in clashes against Al-Houthi aides in order for them to get foodstuffs.
No water, no food. Some people call it Yemen’s Darfur in that the regimes actions in cutting off the roads without providing the basic provisions is in essence targeting the population. Like during the first and second wars.
An official source threatened that tough measures are due to be taken against the Popular Forces Union Party-affiliated Shoura.net for publishing incorrect stories alleging that new jihadist groups have joined the rebellion to fight the Yemeni army.
The source described the story as a fabrication, noting that it’s strange for Shoura.net to publish such news because it’s known to back terrorism since the very beginning of the Sa’ada rebellion. He added that firm action should be taken against the web site for fabricating facts and harming the reputation of the nation, its army and security forces.
“That threat represents a series of official conducts targeting press freedom,” an official at Shoura.net reacted, pointing out that the official source can only deny the story’s authenticity without using language of intimidation or terrorism against the press.
He claims Shoura.net depended upon more than a local source in Abyan governorate when publishing news about the jihadist groups, adding that the web site welcomes any military or civilian comment on the story after its publication. The staff member affirmed that official sources must provide information to members of the press.
a) even i know that the jihaddis are there and I’m in the US and I didn’t hear it from al-Khaiwani either. b) the appropriate way to dispute an article is to issue a statement rebutting it. c) they should lay off al-Khaiwani, just saying.
U.S. Ambassador to Yemen Thomas C. Krajeski ascertained that his government would support Yemen in quelling the rebellion. “We are ready to hear and welcome Yemen’s request for support,” he declared in an interview with 26 September newspaper, “We neither back nor accept any armed rebellion against President Saleh’s government. We hope the rebels surrender their arms and end the crisis.”
Krajeski went on to say, “We’ve worked hard with the military and security forces in Yemen for about five years and I think this cooperation is due to last for some time,” concluding, “The Sa’ada issue is very difficult for the Yemeni government, which we back.”
It’s the first time the U.S. officially has declared its support for the Yemeni government regarding the Sa’ada rebellion. U.S. State Department reports have criticized the fighting in Sa’ada, in addition to Zaidi thoughts.
I liked Khoury’s statement much much better. Khoury says the US will not interfere, is concerned for the civilians, prefers a peaceful settlement, and doesnt buy the garbage about it all being a foreign conspiracy. Obviously they are speaking to two different audiences. A firm statement on humanitarian issues would be nice now that the US has finally broached the subject, also something about civil liberties would be good. Suggest a humanitarian truce perhaps.