Yahya Saleh Calls for Jihad
Head of Central Security he is.
Excellent article from the YemenTimes:
On Tuesday Jan. 23, 2008, Kanan for Palestine, a GONGO (semi-governmental NGO), comprising state officials, academics, and pro regime elements organized a march to protest the Israeli blockade on Gaza. The huge crowd which showed up for the rally was not surprising because Yemenis are well known as a strong enthusiast of the Palestinian just cause. What was surprising is the alleged participation of thousands of soldiers in the protest. The allegations are substantiated by the fact that Kanan is led by Yahya Mohammed Abdullah Saleh—a nephew and an in-law of President Saleh and a brigadier general of Yemen’s Central Security Forces. In fact, Yahya himself headed the crowed and called, in a speech delivered to participants, on unspecified countries to “open the door for jihad and resistance” promising that “our people will join.” The Tuesday incident raises some very important questions concerning the role of military in politics in general and the motives for the Tuesday showoff in particular.
Traditional role
The role of soldiers almost in every country is to fight wars, tightly control borders, hunt drug and human traffickers, and serve as a guarantor of a country’s security and stability. In developed countries, the role of soldiers in politics is carefully monitored by both partisan politicians and civil society activists. It is almost unanimously believed in democratic countries that those who earn their livelihood from waging wars should never be entrusted with decisions relating to peace and war. In some developing countries, soldiers oftentimes serve as a source for legitimacy; he who controls the guns controls political power too.
In Yemen, the military’s has playing a prominent role in politics. In the northern part of Yemen, it was the military who overthrew the Imamate in 1962. While failing to defend the republican regime vis-à-vis tribes loyal to royalists, it nevertheless managed after the national reconciliation to consolidate a very powerful political role. In fact, four out of the five presidents who reigned in north Yemen between 1962 and 1990 came from the military. In south Yemen, the ruling single party subjugated the military to party control. But that did not mean the military stayed out of politics in the south. As the 1986 confrontations between party factions illustrate, military commanders practiced a subtle but very vital political role.
When the two Yemens merged together and formed the Republic of Yemen in May 1990, one of the institutions which were kept divided was the military because both southerners and northerners viewed their militaries as the main guarantors of their political survival. And only with a divided military the northern and southern factions in power could go to war in 1994.
Changing rules
The role of military in politics in Yemen did not change with the adoption of democracy or the occurrence of the 1994 civil war. What changed are the rules by which politics has been played in most recent years. President Saleh, who no longer wears the uniform, never doubted at any time during his long political reign that his political survival and his ability to pass Yemen’s throne to his son depends completely on maintaining a strong, and loyal military. For that reason in particular, he suddenly decided in the late 1990s to withdraw his elected son Ahmed from parliament and started training him as a commander of the elite forces—the Republican Guards and of the Special Forces. In essence, Saleh has been trying over the past few years to restructure the army around his son, colonel Ahmed, and a few of Ahmed’s loyalists. And one thing, which Saleh persists in doping, is to go in front of military units and starts denouncing his political opponents and inciting the military against his rivals.
Almost totally controlled by the president’s brothers, clansmen, and close relatives, the army since 1994 has claimed new political roles. For one, it has become the largest employer in the country and one of the most significant channels for the distribution of patronage and as such a major recruiter of voters and political supporters. For another, the military, with its high mobility, has been used repeatedly as a manipulating mechanism to undermine opponents in various districts during parliamentary elections. Most recently, blain clothed soldiers have been used occasionally to stage huge rallies in support of the president and his ruling party.
